Topic summary
38%1 analyzed article/video1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunting Regulations results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 2,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,099 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 37% (8,461 of 13,340 topics). This Hunting Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Hunting Regulations
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hunting Regulations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hunting Regulations vs sitewide
Hunting Regulations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.