Topic summary
29%3 analyzed articles/videos740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunger Strike results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 834 hits. Analysis detected 6,460 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,716 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (9,638 of 14,394 topics). This Hunger Strike is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Hunger Strike
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hunger Strike attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hunger Strike vs sitewide
Hunger Strike attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.