Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Impact results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 706 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,059 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 13,951 topics). This Humanitarian Impact is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Humanitarian Impact
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Oakland Culture1%
⁠0%Dive Bars1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Humanitarian Impact (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,059
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Humanitarian Impact attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Humanitarian Impact vs sitewide
Humanitarian Impact attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos