Topic summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos2,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Crises results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,128 hits. Analysis detected 6,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,464 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (10,139 of 13,018 topics). This Humanitarian Crises is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Humanitarian Crises
Topic details
Total words: 9,464
Article count: 5
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Humanitarian Crises attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Humanitarian Crises vs sitewide
Humanitarian Crises attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.