Topic summary
28%1 analyzed article/video651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Wildlife Conflict results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 1,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,953 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (9,713 of 14,325 topics). This Human Wildlife Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Human Wildlife Conflict
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Wildlife Conflict attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Wildlife Conflict vs sitewide
Human Wildlife Conflict attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.