Topic summary
74%1 analyzed article/video1,846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Legislation results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 853 hits. Analysis detected 6,497 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 50% (10,761 of 21,474 topics). This Human Rights Legislation is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Human Rights Legislation
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Rights Legislation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Rights Legislation vs sitewide
Human Rights Legislation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.