Topic summary
ā 95%1 analyzed article/video1,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Law results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 652 hits. Analysis detected 3,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,135 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ā 60% (5,305 of 13,021 topics). This Human Rights Law is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Human Rights Law
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Oakland Culture1%
ā 0%Dive Bars1%
ā 60%Human Rights Law (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,135
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Rights Law attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Rights Law vs sitewide
Human Rights Law attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos