Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,273 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Human Elephant Conflict results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 415 hits. Analysis detected 3,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (10,923 of 13,019 topics). This Human Elephant Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.

Human Elephant Conflict

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠17%	Human Elephant Conflict (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 5,092

Article count: 1

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Human Elephant Conflict attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Human Elephant Conflict vs sitewide

Human Elephant Conflict attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Elephants eat their crops. Farmers strike back. It's a war that's only getting worse⁠^34%

KUOW Public Radio⁠^72%By Diaa Hadid⁠^0% Susitha Fernando⁠^0%5/16/2026, 11:33:19 PM