Topic summary
80%1 analyzed article/video346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston City Council results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 906 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,038 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 63% (5,411 of 14,283 topics). This Houston City Council is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Houston City Council
Topic details
Total words: 1,038
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Houston City Council attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Houston City Council vs sitewide
Houston City Council attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos