Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,130 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Hiv Aids Funding results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,428 hits. Analysis detected 7,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (8,939 of 13,018 topics). This Hiv Aids Funding is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.

Hiv Aids Funding

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠32%	Hiv Aids Funding (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 8,520

Article count: 1

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Hiv Aids Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Hiv Aids Funding vs sitewide

Hiv Aids Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Congress gave money for global HIV work. The Trump administration isn't spending it⁠^59%

NPR⁠^85%By Gabrielle Emanuel⁠^0% Jonathan Lambert⁠^0% Fatma Tanis⁠^0%4/4/2026, 9:00:00 AM