Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Historical Discrimination results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,587 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Historical Discrimination is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Historical Discrimination
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Historical Discrimination (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,587
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Historical Discrimination attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Historical Discrimination vs sitewide
Historical Discrimination attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos