Topic summary
57%1 analyzed article/video74 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hiroshima results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 346 faulty-reasoning hits from 296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13% and a BS Rank of 97% (731 of 22,944 topics). This Hiroshima is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Hiroshima
Topic details
Total words: 296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.8% percentile
13.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles296 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.0%26.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 27.4%27.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.1%9.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.9%18.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos