Topic summary

⁠64%1 analyzed article/video881 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Hearings results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 520 hits. Analysis detected 2,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,643 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (5,942 of 15,471 topics). This Hearings is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.

Hearings

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠62%	Hearings (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 2,643

Article count: 1

Authors

Anya Schultz

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Hearings attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Hearings vs sitewide

Hearings attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

SF Supervisors call for hearing after Standard rape-kit investigation⁠^56%

The San Francisco Standard⁠^34%By Anya Schultz⁠^72%7/22/2026, 1:00:00 PM