Topic summary
15%1 analyzed article/video2,455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Healthcare Spending results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 471 hits. Analysis detected 5,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 4% (11,772 of 12,190 topics). This Healthcare Spending is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Healthcare Spending
Topic details
Total words: 9,820
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Healthcare Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Healthcare Spending vs sitewide
Healthcare Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos