Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Health Insurance Coverage results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 1,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Health Insurance Coverage is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Health Insurance Coverage
Topic details
Total words: 3,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos