Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hbcu Sports results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 703 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,946 topics). This Hbcu Sports is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hbcu Sports
Topic details
Total words: 1,276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.4%11.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos