Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hazardous Waste Management results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 355 hits. Analysis detected 598 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,262 topics). This Hazardous Waste Management is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hazardous Waste Management
Topic details
Total words: 6,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos