Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video946 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Harvey Weinstein Trial results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 899 hits. Analysis detected 4,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (5,885 of 13,018 topics). This Harvey Weinstein Trial is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.

Harvey Weinstein Trial

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠55%	Harvey Weinstein Trial (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,784

Article count: 1

Authors

Madeleine Lippey

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Harvey Weinstein Trial attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Harvey Weinstein Trial vs sitewide

Harvey Weinstein Trial attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

This second Harvey Weinstein hung jury should serve as a message⁠^65%

MS NOW⁠^95%By Madeleine Lippey⁠^0%5/18/2026, 11:48:07 PM