Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harvey Weinstein results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 789 hits. Analysis detected 6,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,504 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 32% (8,854 of 13,018 topics). This Harvey Weinstein is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Harvey Weinstein
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Harvey Weinstein attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Harvey Weinstein vs sitewide
Harvey Weinstein attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.