Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harvard University results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 2,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,760 of 16,562 topics). This Harvard University is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Harvard University
Topic details
Total words: 2,500
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Harvard University attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Harvard University vs sitewide
Harvard University attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos