Topic summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video1,258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greenways results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 767 hits. Analysis detected 3,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (11,056 of 22,981 topics). This Greenways is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Greenways
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%4-H Schedule1%
⁠0%4 H Schedule1%
⁠0%Musician Biographies1%
⁠0%Cleveland Politics1%
⁠0%Summer Traditions1%
⁠52%Greenways (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos