Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Outdoors results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 2,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (10,145 of 13,019 topics). This Great Outdoors is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Great Outdoors
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Great Outdoors attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Great Outdoors vs sitewide
Great Outdoors attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.