Topic summary
76%1 analyzed article/video495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grand Jury Proceedings results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 1,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,485 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,300 of 16,562 topics). This Grand Jury Proceedings is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Grand Jury Proceedings
Topic details
Total words: 1,485
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Grand Jury Proceedings attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Grand Jury Proceedings vs sitewide
Grand Jury Proceedings attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos