Topic summary
97%2 analyzed articles/videos1,130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Officials results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 218 hits. Analysis detected 1,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,026 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 71% (3,556 of 11,919 topics). This Government Officials is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Government Officials
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Government Officials attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Government Officials vs sitewide
Government Officials attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.