Topic summary
18%1 analyzed article/video542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Incentives results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Quote-first Misdirection, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 1,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 41% (6,920 of 11,708 topics). This Government Incentives is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Government Incentives
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Government Incentives attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Government Incentives vs All Other Publications
Government Incentives attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.