Topic summary
18%1 analyzed article/video542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Incentives results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Quote-first Misdirection, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 1,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 41% (6,920 of 11,708 topics). This Government Incentives is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Government Incentives
Topic details
Total words: 2,168
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Government Incentives attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Government Incentives vs All Other Publications
Government Incentives attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos