Topic summary
67%1 analyzed article/video511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Hearings results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 366 hits. Analysis detected 2,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 77% (4,003 of 16,783 topics). This Government Hearings is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Government Hearings
Topic details
Total words: 2,044
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Government Hearings attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Government Hearings vs sitewide
Government Hearings attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.