Topic summary
100%1 analyzed article/video132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gold Trade results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 1,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of 99% (278 of 24,545 topics). This Gold Trade is worse (more manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Gold Trade
Topic details
Total words: 528
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.9% percentile
18.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles528 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 45.3%45.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 28.4%28.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 37.7%37.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 43.8%43.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.8%24.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.2%22.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 45.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 43.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 37.7%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 28.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Horn Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos