Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Economics results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 527 hits. Analysis detected 2,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (9,177 of 16,562 topics). This Global Economics is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Global Economics
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Global Economics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Global Economics vs sitewide
Global Economics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.