Topic summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video1,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genre Studies results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,098 hits. Analysis detected 3,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (15,344 of 23,967 topics). This Genre Studies is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Genre Studies
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%4-H Schedule1%
⁠0%4 H Schedule1%
⁠0%Musician Biographies1%
⁠0%Class Analysis1%
⁠0%Cleveland Politics1%
⁠36%Genre Studies (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 7,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos