Topic summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video807 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Identity In Sports results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (11,472 of 22,029 topics). This Gender Identity In Sports is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Gender Identity In Sports
Topic details
Total words: 3,228
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos