Topic summary
28%1 analyzed article/video2,374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Affirming Care Access results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,373 hits. Analysis detected 4,797 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (17,961 of 21,080 topics). This Gender Affirming Care Access is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Gender Affirming Care Access
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Gender Affirming Care Access attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Gender Affirming Care Access vs sitewide
Gender Affirming Care Access attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.