Topic summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 2,139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gain Of Function Research results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 1,655 hits . Analysis detected 7,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 48% (11,634 of 22,265 topics). This Gain Of Function Research is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Gain Of Function Research
Topic details
Total words: 8,556
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 19.3% 19.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst