Topic summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video1,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Future Of Publishing results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 444 hits. Analysis detected 4,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (10,274 of 22,261 topics). This Future Of Publishing is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Future Of Publishing
Topic details
Total words: 4,432
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos