Topic summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video2,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fundraising Practices results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 652 hits. Analysis detected 1,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (16,526 of 21,370 topics). This Fundraising Practices is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Fundraising Practices
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,020
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Fundraising Practices attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Fundraising Practices vs sitewide
Fundraising Practices attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos