Topic summary
41%4 analyzed articles/videos2,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fuel Costs results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,049 hits. Analysis detected 5,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,701 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 15% (10,228 of 12,022 topics). This Fuel Costs is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Fuel Costs
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Fuel Costs attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Fuel Costs vs sitewide
Fuel Costs attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.