Topic summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 1,903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fresno results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 916 hits . Analysis detected 4,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (16,231 of 22,261 topics). This Fresno is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Fresno
Topic details
Total words: 7,612
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst