Topic summary
24%1 analyzed article/video2,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fossil Fuel Infrastructure results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 561 hits. Analysis detected 3,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 13% (18,865 of 21,471 topics). This Fossil Fuel Infrastructure is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Fossil Fuel Infrastructure
Topic details
Total words: 8,608
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Fossil Fuel Infrastructure attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Fossil Fuel Infrastructure vs sitewide
Fossil Fuel Infrastructure attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos