Topic summary
ā 81%1 analyzed article/video914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fossil Fuel Industry Accountability results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 2,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,742 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ā 51% (7,810 of 15,914 topics). This Fossil Fuel Industry Accountability is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Fossil Fuel Industry Accountability
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 51%Fossil Fuel Industry Accountability (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,742
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Fossil Fuel Industry Accountability attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Fossil Fuel Industry Accountability vs sitewide
Fossil Fuel Industry Accountability attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos