Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Food Regulation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 409 hits. Analysis detected 2,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,055 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 14,662 topics). This Food Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Food Regulation
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠0%Alameda County1%
⁠0%Terms Of Use1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Food Regulation (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 5,055
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Food Regulation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Food Regulation vs sitewide
Food Regulation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos