Topic summary
13%1 analyzed article/video1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Banks results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,091 of 21,284 topics). This Food Banks is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Food Banks
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Food Banks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Food Banks vs sitewide
Food Banks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.