Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Assistance Fraud results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 1,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,430 of 16,562 topics). This Food Assistance Fraud is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Food Assistance Fraud
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Food Assistance Fraud attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Food Assistance Fraud vs sitewide
Food Assistance Fraud attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.