Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Flood Risk Assessment results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 263 hits. Analysis detected 1,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,561 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,841 topics). This Flood Risk Assessment is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Flood Risk Assessment
Topic details
Total words: 6,561
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Flood Risk Assessment attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Flood Risk Assessment vs sitewide
Flood Risk Assessment attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos