Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Difficulties results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 2,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,270 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (9,721 of 22,261 topics). This Financial Difficulties is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Financial Difficulties
Topic details
Total words: 3,270
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos