Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Fifa Ethics results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 336 hits. Analysis detected 3,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 14,979 topics). This Fifa Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Fifa Ethics

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠0%	Alameda County	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Fifa Ethics (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 4,188

Article count: 1

Authors

Maria Briceño

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Fifa Ethics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Fifa Ethics vs sitewide

Fifa Ethics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

El presidente de la FIFA podría enfrentar una investigación tras presunto favoritismo hacia EEUU⁠^39%

PolitiFact⁠^3%By Maria Briceño⁠^8%7/15/2026, 2:51:47 PM