Topic summary

⁠45%1 analyzed article/video261 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Female Athletes results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 603 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (8,231 of 21,474 topics). This Female Athletes is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.

Female Athletes

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Musician Biographies	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠0%	Summer Traditions	1%
⁠62%	Female Athletes (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,044

Article count: 1

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Female Athletes attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Female Athletes vs sitewide

Female Athletes attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Question of the Week: “Who is your favorite female athlete?”⁠^38%

The Inlander⁠^9%7/30/2026, 1:30:00 AM