Topic summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feeding Our Future results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 1,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,458 of 15,120 topics). This Feeding Our Future is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Feeding Our Future
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠0%Alameda County1%
⁠71%Feeding Our Future (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,022
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Feeding Our Future attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Feeding Our Future vs sitewide
Feeding Our Future attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos