Topic summary
â 17%1 analyzed article/video2,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Task Forces results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 611 hits. Analysis detected 4,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of â 6% (11,818 of 12,479 topics). This Federal Task Forces is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Federal Task Forces
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Task Forces attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Task Forces vs sitewide
Federal Task Forces attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.