Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Federal Spending results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 620 hits. Analysis detected 4,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 13,884 topics). This Federal Spending is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Federal Spending

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Federal Spending (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 2,088

Article count: 1

Authors

Felix Miller

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Federal Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Federal Spending vs sitewide

Federal Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

The Exceptional Members Backing Accountability in Federal Spending⁠^83%

The Daily Signal⁠^80%By Felix Miller⁠^96%7/17/2026, 1:00:00 PM