Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Sentencing results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 2,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (9,845 of 13,019 topics). This Federal Sentencing is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Federal Sentencing
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Sentencing attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Sentencing vs sitewide
Federal Sentencing attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.