Topic summary
41%34 analyzed articles/videos25,232 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Reserve results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 10,729 hits. Analysis detected 98,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 122,077 analyzed words across 34 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (11,345 of 12,190 topics). This Federal Reserve is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Federal Reserve
Topic details
Total words: 122,077
Article count: 34
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Federal Reserve attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Federal Reserve vs sitewide
Federal Reserve attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.